12 Ways to Get an Architect (INTJ)

Kyle's avatar

Ever wonder how to get an Architect (INTJ) personality type? Maybe you know one and want to learn what makes them tick. Maybe you want to spark a romance with someone of this elusive personality type. Or, maybe you’ve got an Architect rival you want to beat.

Whatever the meaning of “get,” some people seem to give Architects special attention.

Perhaps it’s because they’re uncommon – just 2% of the population. Architects can be aloof, too, often preferring wit over warmth; not always an attractive quality, but it can certainly grant them mystique.

There’s also some truth to the saying that people want what they can’t have. Architects, being somewhat distant and private (as well as scarce), may seem unattainable. That can make them extra attractive to some people.

But who knows? Architectophilia may be in the eye of the beholder. It may even be cunning propaganda from the International Council of Architects (which these personality types won’t admit exists).

Yet the question remains, floating through some people’s minds (and their Internet searches): “How can I get an Architect?” Well, before you try to get one, it might help to know what you’re getting. Let’s explore that.

What about you?

What about you?

Free

Only 10 minutes to get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do.

Take the Test

Decoding Architects

When “get” means understanding an Architect, there’s no better approach than spending time with them. Of course, we offer an amazing Premium Profile about the Architect (INTJ) personality type if you want a master sheet to figuring them out. Our free Architect profile can also give you a decent overview before you try to get closer to one of these people – which isn’t always easy.

Architects think and feel in unique and interesting ways. Keeping certain broad truths in mind when you’re around them can lead to good experiences. (There are always individual variances to discover, of course.)

The following points will help you “get” these arcane personality types.

1. They Only Respect Emotion to a Certain Degree

Architects have emotions like anyone else, but, for most of them, feelings are more like something to “deal with” than live by. They certainly like to laugh and love, but their highest values tend to be rational decision-making, technical precision, and self-control. They often prioritize these things more than some people can comfortably accept.

Some Architects understand the importance of emotional awareness toward themselves and others. They may be open to moments of empathy and expressivity. But this enhances who they are rather than defines them. These personality types rarely value courses guided primarily – or even significantly – by feelings.

In critical matters, Architects depend on their own forms of logic and may look dimly on anything else. For better or worse, they often have core motivations other than sharing or catering to feelings. They don’t intend this style to do harm, and it’s often how they make their best progress in life. It’s good to understand this before developing closeness with an Architect.

2. They Live on Ideas, Not Just Facts

It’s both a reflex and a thrill for Architects to come up with ideas, form opinions, and consider how things might – or should – be. You may hear a lot of imaginative visions when talking with them. For Architects, enthusiastically visualizing an outcome is almost as satisfying as actually accomplishing it.

So, as much as these personalities value exploring the truth of reality, they can also hold their subjective views tightly, especially if hope is attached. Ideally, they argue for their ideas but also test them out, balancing imagination with evidence. Yet Architects’ beliefs – even unproven ones – are a bigger part of who they are than many people realize.

If their ideas are attacked, Architects may firm them up in defense, narrowing their thinking. But people who respect their freedom of thought – and make it painless to explore other points of view – can share inspired conversations with Architects. Knowing an Architect’s dreams helps you know their inner soul.

3. Their Standards Aren’t as Fixed as They Seem

Because they love to evaluate everything, Architects can seem strict. All the energy they pour into figuring out what’s best might make you think they’re impossible to satisfy. But that’s not the whole picture. There’s a difference between preferring things a certain way and being completely rigid about them.

Architect personalities get a kick out of having their opinions, but it’s often just mental exercise to help them learn. They like to optimize but don’t enjoy being limited by perfectionism any more than those around them. For example, Architects might talk tough about the “perfect” pizza – but won’t necessarily refuse other kinds. Their idealistic words frequently give way to realistic choices.

So, satisfying an Architect doesn’t always mean satisfying an exacting standard. Any healthy social interaction (or relationship) is a matter of balancing each person’s individual wants and needs. When Architects get enough of what they want, they will accept the acceptable. (A choice between “good enough or nothing” can help spur their pragmatism.)

So, You Want an Architect, Eh?

What if you find yourself falling for an Architect? Happy, healthy romantic relationships can flourish between any personality types, each combination having its own special rewards. Some people may be especially attracted to certain personalities.

And according to our community, a taste for Architects is a thing. (Some might also say that Architects are like onions – they have many layers and some of the more intense ones might make you cry.)

Joking aside, there are ways that you can maximize the romantic potential with people of this personality type. Nothing’s guaranteed, but we’ve got some tips to improve your chances of hitting it off when you meet an Architect – or getting closer with one you’re already fond of.

Let’s continue our points.

1. Be Your Own Awesomeness

These personality types respect capability and achievement. Architects are also intrigued by interesting things that they’re unfamiliar with. Sometimes, impressing them is just about being your best self and doing something well. Of course, if you’re good at things they admire, all the better – especially if you’re magnanimous about it.

Note that this doesn’t just mean talking about what you can do, though that’s a totally okay and natural impulse when you’re skilled. It’s just that you might risk starting a mutual bragging session as they try to match you with their own accomplishments. But if you demonstrate excellence in your own undeniable way, you might gain their respect – and attention.

2. Present Distinct Social Offers

Despite having sharp preferences, Architects often hesitate to take the lead in social planning, including dates. Some of them can be quite reluctant, in fact. Coordinating their own desires with someone else’s takes a fair bit of empathetic awareness and compromise – not usually their thing. Plus, they’re Introverted, right?

So, if you want to go out with an Architect, be prepared to ask them out (and not just the first time). To make a yes more likely, offer a clear idea of what they can expect and try to stick to it. If you get a no, clarify whether they’re just not into what’s been suggested. And, after a few dates, feel free to let them know when it’s their turn to plan something.

3. Take a Walk on Their Weird Side

Architects often get oddly deep into whatever they like. To get closer to one, consider taking a safari into the wilds of their imagination. You can adapt how you do this based on your interests and personality traits. An animated conversation might be a fun way to start something good. You might not even need to know much, because Architects enjoy explaining what they like – in great detail.

Once things get going, you might escalate to an experience involving their interests. This could be passive, like going somewhere to see something, or a more active pursuit together. Oh, and consider yourself warned: Architect humor can be dark. For example, if their taste runs toward things like movies or comics, keep in mind that they’re just appreciating fiction.

4. Warm Things Up

Architects are famously unromantic compared to some personality types. But while they don’t always think in terms of tender gestures, such expressions do affect them (especially the more sensitive Turbulent Architects). These types may see some romantic symbols as superficial, yet they do care about underlying meanings – both given and received.

Don’t overdo it, though, as that can pressure them in an uncomfortable direction. But anything that has a core benefit will likely be appreciated, even if it’s clothed in commonplace romantic symbolism. For example, Architects might roll their eyes at the idea of a candlelight dinner but still enjoy such a peaceful, soothing, delicious experience.

5. Mirror Their Affection Style

Architect personalities don’t always show their love by the same manner and method that most people do – or that mainstream culture popularizes. One way to help love grow with an Architect is to identify how they give affection and return it in a way they will recognize and value. Is it taking care of a problem? Is it sharing a fun time together? Is it something else…?

Chances are, your Architect will show care for you in roughly the same manner they themselves desire – although this might sometimes be mixed with trying to do what they think they should. But overall, you can probably see what their natural way of showing love is if you pay attention. Then, just offer it back to them. But keep the next point in mind, as well.

6. Make Your Needs Known Clearly

Your needs might not be the same as an Architect’s – but they’re no less important. Relative to most personality types, Architects aren’t very well attuned to other people’s needs and feelings. You’ll probably have to speak up about yours. If there’s a mutual spark, they’ll care about what you want – they just might need a little help understanding it.

Architects are sensitive to change, so it’s best to communicate your needs early in the relationship. Besides, if they can give you what you want, why wait to get it? “But how?” you might ask? Plain words. Not hinting, like, “I think it’s nice to hold hands,” but more direct, like, “I want to hold your hand.” Say what you want. They’ll either do it or not, but they need to know.

7. Brace Yourself for Bumps

Architect personalities often lack social awareness. Their behavior may come off as rude when they don’t mean to be, which can make for a rocky start to togetherness. Before you take anything too personally, though, consider talking about it and giving them a chance to correct it. For these personality types, inconsiderateness can easily be accidental.

Fully appreciating an Architect’s company usually requires acknowledging the difference between intent and effect. It helps if you can put these things into context and address them separately. Also, to put it bluntly (as an Architect might), if you don’t enjoy how Architects behave, they may not be your type after all. You order spicy, you get spicy.

8. Understand Their Independence

Architects tend to insulate some aspects of their lives. You may occupy a lofty place in their heart and mind, but they’ll have their own space too. And this doesn’t always mean solitude. They may have other personal ties and find integrating different social elements together difficult and stressful. Architects might need some time to adjust when you enter their life.

Their need for autonomy isn’t just social, either. For Architects to be happy, there needs to be an untouched part of their mind where they are completely free. For those close to Architects, it can be tough to balance wanting them to be more open and honoring their mental and emotional privacy.

But, that’s part of being with an Architect – some doors can be opened with the right key, some are barred from inside, preserving (appropriately) sovereign territory.

Architects’ Achilles’ Heel: How to De-feet an INTJ

In the introduction, we mentioned “getting” Architects in an adversarial context.

You know, like tripping them up, knocking their feet out from under them, laying traps for them to step in, kicking their butts, etc. Okay, we know foot-themed dad jokes might be toeing the line, so we’ll save the rest for a podcast. (We’re stepping into facetious territory now, folks.)

If you have an Architect enemy, you might be looking for an advantage against them. We don’t condone conflict, yet just as our research shows how to achieve understanding and closeness with this personality type, so does it reveal their weaknesses.

One way to beat an Architect is to outdo them on their own terms. You can match wits with them by finding facts that undermine their assertions and pointing out any flaws in their logic. But not only is this exhausting, it may win only a single battle, not the war overall. (Plus, they might enjoy all that arguing.)

Taking on an Architect might be risky, because as detached as these personalities are, one thing that will get their full attention on you is attacking them.

Their Introversion means that they keep their plans secret. Their Intuitive personality trait helps them devise otherworldly tactics. Their Thinking trait makes it unlikely that compassion will save you. And with their Judging trait, they’ll fight determinedly.

In fact, it might be best to take the advice in the sections above. Architects can make amazing friends, so don’t miss the truly rare opportunity to befriend one. But if you’re hell-bent on destruction, we’ll tell you the secret to truly getting an Architect. (We trust that you’ll never use this information for evil purposes.)

You see, the one thing that no Architect will ever admit, that can lead to their complete annihilation, is [SECTION REDACTED BY ORDER OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTS].

What’s your story of trying to get close to an Architect, and how did it go? Let us know in the comments below!

Further Reading

Support staff Sentinel icon with a speech bubble.
Full understanding is just a click away…

Take our free Personality Test and get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do. If you’ve already taken the test, you can to revisit your results any time you’d like!

Comments

Please to join the discussion.

INTJ avatar
It brings me great joy to see in the comments people who respond as I do. I especially enjoy the "not debate" we fall into when trying to be self aware and sensitive, which seldom ever works out as intended. I often find myself in the scenario where I try to clarify more about my claim after the person already implicitly understands, ergo contextually misplacing parts of my arguement that I try to retroactively put back in my claim, even though that causes the person I'm talking to *deep inhale* to feel as though I misunderstood their understanding of the argument or my intent, causing them to want to clarify to me that they did INDEED understand, even though that leads us to repeat the exact same mistake by trying to retroactively add more to our previous retroactive attachment to our initial claim. Do you guys feel me on this one? Is it just me?
INTP avatar
It happens all the time :)
INTJ avatar
Oh god man- I feel you.
INTJ avatar
No, it is not just you. I could feel the *deep inhale* moment throughout my body. Actually its quite annoying... Most of the time, while I'm explaining, I can already see what the reaction will be and that they'll come to the wrong conclusion
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
NOTE FROM THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTS: Fortunately, we were able to redact the secret to our demise that was almost published in this article. However, the traitor who revealed it will be found and punished. Anyone who somehow learned it will be quietly and quickly taken care of. If you have information on the traitor or anyone who s/he may have informed, you are encouraged to come forward.
INTJ avatar
This is not a drill. We are dead serious. That's just how Architects work.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
SECOND NOTE FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTS: To further evaluate; nobody shall ever know the one way to de-feet us (sorry, got a little carried away). Yes, the person who was responsible for posting this will be found. Anybody who knows, except for fellow Architects; you will be quietly punished.
INTJ avatar
Thanks council.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Thank you council, I'm so relieved.
INTJ avatar
Can I join the council?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
That's hilarious that the complete annihilation of Architects was "REDACTED BY ORDER OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTS."
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Unfortunately, the ICA does not exist. Nor did this conversation. You did not see this. Kindly erase this from your memories. Thank you.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Good luck with that, my [REDACTED BY ORDER OF POWERFUL ANONYMOUS] is an Architect.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
One thing: when I read the sentence, ‘or maybe you have an Architect that you want to beat.’ I just went into aggressive mode
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I must admit that I was boundlessly astonished with such an unimaginable idea. "Beating" an Architect? Who could possibly think of this while we are so cool, lovely and cute?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I love your description of us
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Exactly. We are too good for todays world, with all our qualities.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Me, too. Also, I unconciously started to think about the way(s) of beating me and immediately created a defense.
INTJ avatar
I love this thread. But call any of us cute, it may be the last word you say.
ISTJ avatar
Am I the only person here who has never been intimitated by the Architect personality type?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Could you please explain on what basis do you assume that Architect type might have been seen as "intimidating"? Quiet, distant, withdrawn, definitely yes, but intimidating? I'd say that among Analysts rather a Debater or especially a Commander might be perceived as intimidating. Nevertheless, if we were to make that assumption for a moment, I think that you wouldn't feel intimidated because Logisticians are very similar. I personally perceive Architects and Logisticians as two sides of one coin: one focuses on planning and the other on action.
ISTJ avatar
So you used the words "Quiet, distant, withdrawn," which I agree with. But add these following qualities to that list which are also listed through out the Architect profile and you may understand how I came to interpret that many find INTJ's intimidating; the bitterest pessimists, arrogant, judgmental, "their sarcasm and dark humor aren’t for everyone" "They constantly outsmart their peers as they maintain control," not to mention "many fictional villains are modeled on this personality type." Now I will be honest, I maybe misinterpreting the tone in which the Architect profile is written, the tone in which articles such as this one are written in and the way most comments are written about INTJ's because so far I get a sense that most literature about Architects has an aura of reverence that other types do not seem to receive. But then again maybe I am wrong. With regards to other analyst types however I also do not find them intimidating perhaps because I live with 4 of them in my house. 2 Logicians (1 assertive, 1 turbulent), an Assertive Commander, and an Assertive Debater. So maybe I am just used to Analysts in general. But the most interesting part of you comment to me was that you "percieve Architects and Logisticians as two sides of one coin" and I would like hear your more elaborate thoughts on the matter.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Okay, so let's address these subjects one by one. However, before I proceed with that, I would like to indicate - and stress it very much - that I don't think I've ever met any other Architect in the past, so I feel entitled to speak only for myself and what I'm going to say is basing solely on my thoughts and experiences. When it comes to being "the bitterest pessimists" indicated in the introduction you didn't mention it was combined with being the most positive dreamers. I guess this comes from the fact that, learning much from the very young age about human nature, interpersonal relationships, history of nations and societies, it early comes quite visible that there are numerous patterns which definitely prove that most of the issues and conflicts humanity is struggling with, simply repeat over and over, and while people could, especially nowadays, learn from their predecessors' mistakes in order to do avoid them, they keep repeating them. Just like Jeremy Irons says in hist last monologue in "Margin Call": "It's all just the same thing, over and over, we can't help ourselves. And you and I can't control it or stop it or even slow it, or even ever-so-slightly alter it. We just react". And as the time goes by, this tendency seems only to strenghten, while you watch people and repeatedly speak to yourself "I knew what was going to happen, and yet still I deluded myself that it's going to be different this time". Being arrogant and judgmental - I guess this isn't Architects' exclusive specialty, but who knows, maybe I'm wrong. I guess this may seem so especially when it's accompanied by concentrating mostly or even only on purely intellectual aspects of everything. You know, instead of "I see that you feel this and because of it you do that" it winds up with an attitude like "I know you feel so, but's illogical, so change this and become rational right now". Sarcasm and dark humour - I don't think there's anything to say, explain or debate about. I can - speaking for myself - agree that sometimes, or rather quite often, I have a tendency for that and, because in the past people mostly misunderstood it, now I keep it for myself. Just for the sake of easing my coexistence with other people and to avoid countless explaining that I do not wish people bad or laugh at them. Outsmarting peers and gaining control... I can agree with that, but on condition that we do not understand control only as a position which enables you to make others do what you want, but rather as a situation which allows you to avoid other people's interference with your life and keeping you independent. Control understood as "I want to do this and that and I do not allow others to press me to fulfill their expectations; I walk my own path and simply put just don't want others to interfere with that, leave me alone and everything will be okay". Fictional villains - I guess this is because of these stressed parts, referring to analyzing and planning, combine this with erasing any higher, positive feelings, and there he/she is, an archetypical heartless AI-like evil mastermind. But please bear in mind that modeling does not equal with copying in 1:1 scale. Possible misinterpretation - I don't know whether you misinterpret or not. Maybe it's because of people and characters indicated as popular ones of this type? Lets be honest: when you think of Tywin Lannister, Petyr Baelish or Professor Moriarty, you can admire their intellectual skills, but - say the least - they just don't seem to be your first pick when you think about a person you would like to befriend. I wish this quite overwhelming first impression could be outweighed by wise and benevolent Gandalf the Grey.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
And - last but not least - when it comes to answering to your question why do I perceive Architects and Logisiticians as two sides of one coin... Well, in order to say more than is stated in both types' introductions and avoid something what Ralph Waldo Emerson accurately named "milling in the mill of a truism", I'd only indicate that in my opinion there's a vital core very similar for both types: taking circumstances into consideration, evaluating pros and cons basing on logical analysis and then making proper decisions. The essence of the difference is - simplyfying - being located on two opposite poles on the scale "Actual circumstances - Future possibilities". Whereas Architect thinks "Okay, so when X happens, the next steps are this, this and this" and then takes possible effects of every next step into consideration, Logistician thinks "Okay, so today I'm going to do this, this and this" and then ticks off points from the list. While Architect thinks things through and then again and again, Logistician considers circumstances, thinks what, how and when needs to be done and then meticulously executes the plan. While Architect would say "lets think about it, consider all possible effects and think what may happen next, so that we've thought about any possible scenario", Logisitician would rather say "we need to think what we need to do, and once we know it, let's get the job done". That's how I see it. Rationality, focusing on logic and solitary planning, preparing and acting is the key. The emphasis is put on a slightly different issues, but the crucial core is common for both types.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
The last two comments were very (intellectually) refreshing! I enjoyed reading them, and they very neatly outlined Architect traits as well as differences between two types. I’d like to say-with a bit of reluctance-that I don’t have anything intelligent to add. I just wanted to show appreciation.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
It's very nice to hear that, thank you.
ENFJ avatar
yes you are
ENFJ avatar
yeah, I agree!
ENFJ avatar
I appreciate you going through the trouble and typing all that.
ENFJ avatar
Well, I know an Architect who is incredibly powerful, and that's why I'm intimidated. The other factors wouldn't be what I call "intimidating".
ENFJ avatar
This whole website is intellectually refreshing, and I come here to relax when I'm mentally disturbed.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
You aren't intimidated? You have gotten the attention of the INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ARCHITECTS. You will be quietly dealt with now.
ISTJ avatar
I'm still not intimidated.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Ok, I get it. But don't get it at the same time. I mean, in the first place, how are we intimidating? This is just who we are. And I understand the fact that you know several Architects. So you may not be intimidated too much. And in the so called debate you had, you seemed to only outline the bad qualities if an Architect. Think about our good qualities. I mean, we can be one of the best friends you've ever had, if we choose to. So, instead of just saying 'I am not intimidated by Architects', also state why. That would have not stared the 'debate.' But again, who doesn't like a good debate. I understand you are still not intimidated. The comment written be the so called "International council of Architects" was just mean to be a joke. If it was misread, my mistake. We don't mean for you to be intimidated (or not). It is only out personality. We think through every scenario, while Logisticians just think of a solution, then just do it. Like the fellow Architect was was in the Debate, I've always thought of Logisticians and Architects as two sides of the same coin; they can come across as very similar personalities after close analysis. And if this was too long to read, this is just my opinion and the facts from the Architect article. So, if you are not intimidated, I totally get that, I just want to know why.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Just wanted to add: I am not trying to get you to be intimidated by us. I am just trying to correct my 'joke'. I understand it was misunderstood. And if this starts a debate, I just want to say in advance that I don't mean to. I am only trying to prove my point. And again, I understand why you are not intimidated by Architects. If any of the information I wrote is wrong, I have never met another Architect before, so I am just using my own experience and opinions, along with several facts stated in the article about Architects.
ISTJ avatar
Aurora, you misread my reply. I understood that you were making a joke. And I was not being combative with my reply; I was saying it in a cheerful banter tone between friends. And yes I only pointed out the negative parts of your personality type for 2 reasons. 1. people respond more severely to negatives than to positives 2. from my experience INTJs tend to express their darker side more commonly than their positive side. This can scare some. I see you wish to know why "I am not intimidated by Architects"? Well to tell you the truth I am not intimidated by Architects probably for the same reason I am not intimidated by any other personality type; I'm just simply not. In other words I don't know why. Why are some people deathly afraid of spiders and others not? I don't know. (I am not comparing you guys to spiders by the way) You also asked "how are we intimidating?" To be completely honest with you Aurora, I am the wrong person to ask because I don't find you intimidating. I was just simply posing a question and giving my thoughts/opinion as to why others may find you intimidating. However, earlier in the conversation, Srijan did confirm that I am the only person here (probably jokingly) not to be intimidated by you guys. Ask Srijan why he/she is intimidated because I to would like to know. Now maybe I am reading too much into this but some of your words betray you Aurora. "you know several Architects. So you may not be intimidated too much." I am looking at the words "too much" here. By saying that "[I] may not be intimidated too much" shows that you personally have had the feeling that you are intimidating others. It also seems to imply that INTJs just simply intimidate. P.S. You did something very Architect/INTJ and I think you did it without even realising it.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I understand what you said. I also agree with it. Looking closely, I think we were both trying to say the same thing, but just misunderstood each other.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Also, I agree with the fact that INTJ's simply intimidate. When you think of Professor Moriarty, you think of the villain in Sherlock Holmes, but also a very intellectual and calculating person. That is enough to intimidate most people. I understand the fact that you simply not intimidated by any personality type, especially Analysts. Honestly, I feel that way too; I've met many people in my life, and a lot of them have been what people might call 'intimidating'. People might find INTJ intimidating, but it is just the way we are. We tend to show negative qualities more than positive qualities, yes, but we just have a very "weird" way of thinking. Think of an Architect's thinking process as clockwork; taking in every fact and analyzing everything, applying reasoning and logic and creativity, and delivering the verdict. And INTJs hate an emotional monkey wrench in there clockwork of thoughts. This comes off as cold and intimidating to most people. It is normal to us. I've actually heard many people say they are intimidated by INTJs. I like to say that we might not be the first people you turn to for a friend, but hopefully this is outweighed by Gandalf the Grey. Also, I liked your way of thinking; it really helped me see things in a new way. Interesting.
INTP avatar
You're in trouble now. Ohhh, you're in BIG trouble....
INTJ avatar
Dear god this just- WE'RE NOT INTIMIDATING!! my friends say I'm intimidating but they're afraid of people in general.
INFJ avatar
To be fair -- the phrasing of that reply can intimidate others, particularly Diplomat personality types. I personally found the response not intimidating but rather ironically funny. But I also am the Assertive variant of my personality type. Turbulent personality types with the feeling trait can find the bold exclamation too forthright and blunt, which can give an intimidating sensation. Doesn't mean your approach is "wrong" or that their feelings are "wrong" -- they just "are" because, well, personality.