When You Can’t Stop Getting into Fights with a Debater (ENTP)

Leeza's avatar

A member of the 16Personalities Community recently asked us the following question: “How do you have a debate with a Debater and live to tell about it? Or, at least, avoid things getting hostile?”

As the resident (and only) Debater (ENTP) of the 16Personalities team, answering this question fell to me.

At first, I was confused by the question. Confused and amused that people genuinely wanted to know how to defeat my personality type in an argument. I think I speak for all Debaters when I say thank you. It’s so flattering that you find us so impressive. Especially when you consider that out of the Analyst Role group – including Architects (INTJ), Logicians (INTP), and Commanders (ENTJ) – Debaters are very much the classmate eating glue in the corner. That is to say, I think of myself as a very simple person, not at all complex, and I think my fellow Debaters would agree.

Anyway, the more I thought about the question, the more I realized that I couldn’t answer it on my own. After all, I don’t know what it’s like to be on the other side of an argument with me. So I polled the people I have significantly peeved off in the past.

What about you?

What about you?

Free

Only 10 minutes to get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do.

Take the Test

Questioning People I’ve Debated in the Past

I asked the people I’ve truly argued with – the kind of arguing that includes yelling, angry pauses, glaring, and maybe even a little crying – what the experience was like.

These were their responses:

  • Consul (ESFJ): “It’s like talking to a wall, except the wall is angry for no reason and pushes its beliefs on you.”
  • Architect (INTJ): “It feels like this quote: ‘Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.’”
  • Campaigner (ENFP): “Um… The person arguing with you has to be very patient. And they have to keep an inside voice, otherwise things are gonna get very loud. If the person doesn’t have patience, y’all would just be talking over each other.”
  • Advocate (INFJ): *Didn’t respond*
  • Entertainer (ESFP): “You’re very stubborn, but that’s just you being passionate. You have a way, and that’s it for you, and that’s fine! You still listen to the other’s opinion, but it won’t change the way you think. I’m thinking about the time you and Defender* got into an argument about The Little Mermaid.”
  • *Aforementioned Defender (ISFJ): “You’re very passionate…and sometimes physical.”
  • Commander (ENTJ): “Personally, I love arguing with you because you often use logic and facts, but there are areas in which you give way to emotion, due to personal experience related to the topic. But you’re definitely a formidable foe.”

The Problem People Have with Debaters (and a Response from a Debater)

Thank you to all my loved ones who answered – and to all my not-loved ones who sent me responses that I can’t responsibly post on this family-friendly website. These were the common critiques about the way Debater personality types argue, with my personal commentary attached.

Critique: Debaters tend to argue disingenuously, and this could be bothersome to people who have a strong definition of “truth” and have a lot of respect for said truth.

Response: When I start to quibble with someone, it’s because (a) I’m bored, or (b) they just said something fantastically stupid. Situation B is rarer as I get older, as I’ve learned to walk away. So, yes, I do argue disingenuously because I have nothing else to do.

Critique: Debaters can seem disrespectful, pushing the personal boundaries of others too far.

Response: There are no boundaries for me when I argue (save mentioning personal tragedies). This is mostly because I feel comfortable talking about anything and everything. But if you tell me to stop, I’ll stop immediately. However, the other person needs to state their boundaries. It’s not my responsibility to try to perceive what the other’s limits are.

Critique: Debaters seem as though their minds can’t be changed.

Response: They can be changed. But depending on how I feel or how much I want to irritate the other person, I can stick with an opinion that we both know is wrong. Am I being a bad person? …Maybe?

Critique: Debaters make people feel as though they don’t have any respect for them.

Response: No, it’s not that I don’t respect you. It’s that I don’t respect your opinion. [I was told later by a Feeling personality type that this was not the correct response.]

Critique: Debaters care more about the argument than the person they’re arguing with.

Response: Depends on who it is. If it’s someone I care about, I’ll stop. If it’s someone I don’t care about, why should I stop?

Critique: Debaters intimidate people by how zealously they argue.

Response: I do get excited. And it does scare others off. It’s just that whatever the person is saying might be so interesting (whether it’s correct or incorrect) that I just have to reply. I’m so excited to reply! I’m so excited to be part of this exchange!

Critique: Debaters don’t seem to care about the actual information.

Response: If I’m genuinely arguing, then yes, I care. If I’m arguing because it’s entertaining to irritate the other person, then I will argue that the sky is actually green and that fish can fly, despite all other evidence.

Response to the Original Question

So, back to the original question: “How do you have a debate with a Debater and live to tell about it? Or, at least, avoid things getting hostile?”

Short answer? You don’t. Debater personalities don’t mean to come off as aggressive or hostile. More often than not, they’re just intensely excited about the opportunity to debate. That doesn’t make your perception of them as hostile invalid, however. Instead, I say embrace the perceived hostility. That is to say, don’t take any of it personally, and maybe even throw back some barbs or mean humor of your own. Debaters like to tease and will likely enjoy it if you tease back. We live for the banter – negative or positive.

However, if you don’t want to embrace the chaos, that’s fine too. Let the Debater know, “Hey, I’m uncomfortable with the way we’re communicating.” The dogged Debater should stop once you present your boundaries.

And if they don’t stop?

Well, at that point, your issue is less about dealing with a Debater and more about dealing with a jerk (regardless of personality type).

Remember that no one, no matter their personality type, has the right to trample over your boundaries once you state them.

Further Reading

  • Is it an Architect personality type getting the best of you instead of a Debater? Here are 12 ways to understand those angry little robots better.
  • It doesn’t matter what personality type it comes from or if it’s a joke – criticism can really hurt! If you feel like criticism (or conflict of any kind, really) gets to you, check out our piece, “When Criticism Gets Personal.”
  • Did you know that our members’ Academy has awesome (and easy) tools to help your friendships and your love life, like our Type Guessers for friendship and romance and our Intertype Test? They’re just two more reasons to join today and see what you’ve been missing.
Support staff Sentinel icon with a speech bubble.
Full understanding is just a click away…

Take our free Personality Test and get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do. If you’ve already taken the test, you can to revisit your results any time you’d like!

Comments

Please to join the discussion.

A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I just came here from a group chat in which I was destroying someone over the controversial topic of eating pineapple on pizza. Let's just say I won...
ENTP avatar
You won as in you proved pineapple pizza is good, right?
ENTP avatar
just to be clear you support it RIGHT?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Ummm... not exactly...
INFJ avatar
Are we going to have a pineapple on pizza debate? I support pineapple on pizza, pineapple should be with all foods! (Note, I’m not just supporting pineapple on pizza because the debator supports it and I want to be on her side, lol).
INTJ avatar
Pineapple on pizza is good - this is the factual answer. ;D
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Well... I do not like pineapple on my pizza...
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Who likes pineapple on their pizza? It's great, am I right? What else do you guys like? Kiwi on your pasta? Cheese on your ice cream?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I do not mind pizza with pineapple. As long as I do not have to eat it. Do you want to put marshmallows on your pizza? Why not? Just try it! Maybe it will be very delicious!
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Of course! By the way, Papa John's has a very good pineapple and ham pizza...
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
There is actually a Belgian dish called "Peach and Tuna" and its amazing you should try it
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Hold up, peach and tuna?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Interesting!Keep going everyone!
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
yes to cheese on ice cream and pineapple pizza, not too sure about kiwi on pasta
INTP avatar
Wow, even for me it’s really true and relatable. But it suits even more my ENTP uncle lol.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
It can result relatable for me too, but I think it is because of my brother's influence. He is a debater.
INTP avatar
That’s possible. I’m not really close to my uncle to be honest but I’m often acting ENTP to my ISFJ friend just to upset her lol
ENFP avatar
Because I have a very, very, VERY close sibling who's a debater, this still raises the question: If you were trying to come to a mutual conclusion with the debater to no avail, do they feel that the argument was worth it?
INTJ avatar
I'm not a debater, but I think the basis of your question is off. Wanting to come to a mutual conclusion is what YOU want to do. For the typical debater, I think they simply enjoy the debate itself and they aim to win more than find common ground. So if no mutual conclusion happens, its not really a loss for them. I think so long as they found the debate engaging, its worth it for them.
ENTP avatar
It really depends on what the debate is about. Best restaurant? I don't care how the discussion ends. Most efficient way to get something done? We should probably figure that out. Best baby names? Unless there's a baby being born this week I'm going to keep this one going as long as I can.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
One of my high school classmates is a Debater. He loves arguing so much, so I usually prevent debates by going with pretty much whatever he says. :D
ENTP avatar
that might seem like the best thing to do but i HATE agreeing with people. i think a common misconception is that ENTP’s want to force their opinions on you. we don’t. we like arguing purely for the sake of it, not to convince anyone. it’s FUN for us. if you don’t want to argue, you should probably tell your friend because nothing is more annoying than when people blindly agree with you.
INTJ avatar
So now we have the answer to the article's question. The best way to deal with a debate with a debater is to nuke it by being very agreeable LOL.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
The thing is, arguing with him IS FUN, but I'm not ALWAYS in the mood for it.
INTJ avatar
To keep things interesting, I usually fight the ENTP in my class on everything
INFJ avatar
XD I haven’t laughed so much reading something in a while! Confirmed some of the things I thought about debaters ENTPs. Here were my favorite parts: “Advocate (INFJ): *Didn’t respond” and “...-and to all my not-loved ones who sent me responses that I can’t responsibly post on this family-friendly website.” Unless I felt hurt by the person arguing with me or I feel like they couldn’t handle what I wanted to say, I would definitely give the debaters I know some honest critique.
INTJ avatar
I liked what the INTJ said