When You Can’t Stop Getting into Fights with a Debater (ENTP)

Leeza's avatar

A member of the 16Personalities Community recently asked us the following question: “How do you have a debate with a Debater and live to tell about it? Or, at least, avoid things getting hostile?”

As the resident (and only) Debater (ENTP) of the 16Personalities team, answering this question fell to me.

At first, I was confused by the question. Confused and amused that people genuinely wanted to know how to defeat my personality type in an argument. I think I speak for all Debaters when I say thank you. It’s so flattering that you find us so impressive. Especially when you consider that out of the Analyst Role group – including Architects (INTJ), Logicians (INTP), and Commanders (ENTJ) – Debaters are very much the classmate eating glue in the corner. That is to say, I think of myself as a very simple person, not at all complex, and I think my fellow Debaters would agree.

Anyway, the more I thought about the question, the more I realized that I couldn’t answer it on my own. After all, I don’t know what it’s like to be on the other side of an argument with me. So I polled the people I have significantly peeved off in the past.

What about you?

What about you?

Free

Only 10 minutes to get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do.

Take the Test

Questioning People I’ve Debated in the Past

I asked the people I’ve truly argued with – the kind of arguing that includes yelling, angry pauses, glaring, and maybe even a little crying – what the experience was like.

These were their responses:

  • Consul (ESFJ): “It’s like talking to a wall, except the wall is angry for no reason and pushes its beliefs on you.”
  • Architect (INTJ): “It feels like this quote: ‘Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.’”
  • Campaigner (ENFP): “Um… The person arguing with you has to be very patient. And they have to keep an inside voice, otherwise things are gonna get very loud. If the person doesn’t have patience, y’all would just be talking over each other.”
  • Advocate (INFJ): *Didn’t respond*
  • Entertainer (ESFP): “You’re very stubborn, but that’s just you being passionate. You have a way, and that’s it for you, and that’s fine! You still listen to the other’s opinion, but it won’t change the way you think. I’m thinking about the time you and Defender* got into an argument about The Little Mermaid.”
  • *Aforementioned Defender (ISFJ): “You’re very passionate…and sometimes physical.”
  • Commander (ENTJ): “Personally, I love arguing with you because you often use logic and facts, but there are areas in which you give way to emotion, due to personal experience related to the topic. But you’re definitely a formidable foe.”

The Problem People Have with Debaters (and a Response from a Debater)

Thank you to all my loved ones who answered – and to all my not-loved ones who sent me responses that I can’t responsibly post on this family-friendly website. These were the common critiques about the way Debater personality types argue, with my personal commentary attached.

Critique: Debaters tend to argue disingenuously, and this could be bothersome to people who have a strong definition of “truth” and have a lot of respect for said truth.

Response: When I start to quibble with someone, it’s because (a) I’m bored, or (b) they just said something fantastically stupid. Situation B is rarer as I get older, as I’ve learned to walk away. So, yes, I do argue disingenuously because I have nothing else to do.

Critique: Debaters can seem disrespectful, pushing the personal boundaries of others too far.

Response: There are no boundaries for me when I argue (save mentioning personal tragedies). This is mostly because I feel comfortable talking about anything and everything. But if you tell me to stop, I’ll stop immediately. However, the other person needs to state their boundaries. It’s not my responsibility to try to perceive what the other’s limits are.

Critique: Debaters seem as though their minds can’t be changed.

Response: They can be changed. But depending on how I feel or how much I want to irritate the other person, I can stick with an opinion that we both know is wrong. Am I being a bad person? …Maybe?

Critique: Debaters make people feel as though they don’t have any respect for them.

Response: No, it’s not that I don’t respect you. It’s that I don’t respect your opinion. [I was told later by a Feeling personality type that this was not the correct response.]

Critique: Debaters care more about the argument than the person they’re arguing with.

Response: Depends on who it is. If it’s someone I care about, I’ll stop. If it’s someone I don’t care about, why should I stop?

Critique: Debaters intimidate people by how zealously they argue.

Response: I do get excited. And it does scare others off. It’s just that whatever the person is saying might be so interesting (whether it’s correct or incorrect) that I just have to reply. I’m so excited to reply! I’m so excited to be part of this exchange!

Critique: Debaters don’t seem to care about the actual information.

Response: If I’m genuinely arguing, then yes, I care. If I’m arguing because it’s entertaining to irritate the other person, then I will argue that the sky is actually green and that fish can fly, despite all other evidence.

Response to the Original Question

So, back to the original question: “How do you have a debate with a Debater and live to tell about it? Or, at least, avoid things getting hostile?”

Short answer? You don’t. Debater personalities don’t mean to come off as aggressive or hostile. More often than not, they’re just intensely excited about the opportunity to debate. That doesn’t make your perception of them as hostile invalid, however. Instead, I say embrace the perceived hostility. That is to say, don’t take any of it personally, and maybe even throw back some barbs or mean humor of your own. Debaters like to tease and will likely enjoy it if you tease back. We live for the banter – negative or positive.

However, if you don’t want to embrace the chaos, that’s fine too. Let the Debater know, “Hey, I’m uncomfortable with the way we’re communicating.” The dogged Debater should stop once you present your boundaries.

And if they don’t stop?

Well, at that point, your issue is less about dealing with a Debater and more about dealing with a jerk (regardless of personality type).

Remember that no one, no matter their personality type, has the right to trample over your boundaries once you state them.

Further Reading

  • Is it an Architect personality type getting the best of you instead of a Debater? Here are 12 ways to understand those angry little robots better.
  • It doesn’t matter what personality type it comes from or if it’s a joke – criticism can really hurt! If you feel like criticism (or conflict of any kind, really) gets to you, check out our piece, “When Criticism Gets Personal.”
  • Did you know that our members’ Academy has awesome (and easy) tools to help your friendships and your love life, like our Type Guessers for friendship and romance and our Intertype Test? They’re just two more reasons to join today and see what you’ve been missing.
Support staff Sentinel icon with a speech bubble.
Full understanding is just a click away…

Take our free Personality Test and get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do. If you’ve already taken the test, you can to revisit your results any time you’d like!

Comments

Please to join the discussion.

A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I don't like getting into arguments with my friends who are Debaters because when I make an argument they attack me as a person as well. I find other people's viewpoints interesting so I like to debate but I hate debating with them as I feel constantly attacked. It is also like talking to a brick wall as I will try to see their argument but they don't want to see mine. When they go too far and start attacking me, I feel offended and say that I don't want to keep debating if it means I going to be attacked. They often reply with I'm sorry that you are too sensitive to debate and don't debate if you can't stand the heat. To me, there is a difference between a good healthy debate and actually just being mean and stubborn. I do get annoyed that their need to win the debate means that they attack me and will not listen to my points. I feel like almost saying you are not a good debater, you are just rude and insensitive. I don't see the point of debating if you are just going to hurt people cause your bored.
INFP avatar
It sound like you just know some crappy ENTPs. I have a few ENTP friends ( I also used to be one), and though they can be a little insensitive, its just their way of fun.
ENTP avatar
I don't quite agree about us being simple. I'm an extremely complex person compared to many people I know, but maybe I'm an exception. Other than that, it's good.
INTP avatar
I was really curious about a Logician vs Debater because I have a feeling one of my online friends is a debater since we spend all the time bantering over random stuff. And believe it or not, it's quite an even match and I find I enjoy it a lot.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I know right? I have a debater friend- I usually don't argue/debate when I'm in public because it makes me feel weird, but when we talk online we sometimes get into rather... interesting... debates
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
It sounds strange, but my written arguments are almost always better than my verbal argument unless I've thoroughly researched the topic before the verbal argument.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Interesting. Debating for fun? Not really. Usually I do not start an argument just for the sake of arguing. For me arguing and debating have a clear purpose. Only when bored, agitated or annoyed I may just start arguing and debating about literally anything. Also, there should be something to gain too: better understanding, gaining knowledge and working on my reasoning skills. I hate losing debates, though. Consequently, I will be very reluctant and stubborn to admit defeat. When someone offers something interesting or a new perspective or point of view I am nonetheless eager to improve my game. Game, set, match!
INFP avatar
Sounds like me. I consider myself a good debater when I need it, but I have a lot more fun in monologues, where I am the only one who can hear and can express myself without interruption. I exercise my mind more by listening to debates than necessarily participating in one.
INTJ avatar
I strongly relate to your comment Gert-Jan. For me the idea of a fun debate is more exploring a topic from multiple angles rather than arguing or trying to prove something. That said, I also hate to lose but I'll also walk away if I feel its getting too heated or if you can tell the conversation is not going to go anywhere. Like you said, I want to feel like something was accomplished even if it's something as small as gaining a new perspective I hadn't thought of before. What I actually enjoy though is sometimes having an internal debate/monologue. I'll picture someone and imagine a conversation on a certain subject. Gives me the chance to bounce ideas while organizing my thoughts.
ENTP avatar
You said you don't argue for fun, yet you argue because you're bored? Contradictory much?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Yeah. Like most ENTPs I do not mind some contradictory statements. I guess that is part of being ENTP. You say you do not argue for fun, but actually you do.
INTJ avatar
It's nice to know from different perspective. Helps to understand better! :D