Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)

How to Think and Feel About the Thinking and Feeling Traits

Our third, Nature scale reveals the extent to which we value emotions or rationality more when considering options. Does a person tend to use the Thinking (T) personality trait, which relies on the head, or the Feeling (F) trait, which relies on the heart?

But let’s not oversimplify. Think of it instead as you might your hand preference: A left-handed person leans more heavily on their left hand, but they still use their right hand, albeit less. We can apply the same approach to a person with a dominant Thinking trait or a dominant Feeling trait – they aren’t without some qualities of the non-dominant trait.

What about you?

What about you?

Free

Only 10 minutes to get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do.

Take the Test

Thinking (T) Personality

“How Does This Help?”

83% of people with the Thinking trait say it’s best to take a scientific approach to the problems in their own lives, compared to 43% of those with the Feeling trait.

When presented with a decision, people with the Thinking trait typically lean on objective information. Knowledge is their indispensable tool. Once these personality types gather the facts, they test their alternatives against logic and reason to see which decision, by those standards, proves the most effective or realistic. They generally manage their relationships by employing fairness and effectiveness as their primary method of dealing with others. Their passions are born of respect.

74% of people with the Thinking trait say it’s easy for them to make important decisions without consulting with someone else first, compared to 42% of those with the Feeling trait.

Whatever value people with the Thinking personality trait place on relationships, they can still dismiss emotional responses, either their own or those of others. This is often because of their discomfort with emotions, which don’t always follow the rational path they value. Sometimes, emotions just puzzle them. But that doesn’t mean they have hearts of stone. They often feel in deep, profound ways – they would just rather not decide matters from that place. And, perhaps unfortunately, they may see those who do as weaker decision-makers.

People with the Thinking personality trait can use rational thought to see that humans are inherently emotional – and that this is okay.

Personality types with the Thinking trait are likely to evaluate things almost relentlessly. This isn’t as bad as it sounds. They aren’t satisfied if they believe something is not well thought out – they revel in the brilliance of an elegant plan. This makes them great to have around when critical thinking and impartiality of any kind is the focus, and this makes them immensely helpful for sorting out ideas and methods. Their primary filter is, “How does this help?”

Feeling (F) Personality

“Who Does This Help?”

88% of those with the Feeling trait said they value and cherish their emotions, compared to 47% of those with the Thinking trait.

People with the Feeling (F) trait follow their hearts and emotions – sometimes without even realizing it. They may show it to different degrees and in different ways, but however they do it, Feeling personality types tend to be caring, compassionate, and warm. These concerned people can be highly protective of those they care about – whether that is their immediate family or remote populations in need.

For those with the Feeling trait, decisions tend to be based on the well-being of others.

However, people with the Feeling personality trait often find they become excessive in their concern for others. They may easily burn out – or cause others to – when they become too involved. These emotionally aware individuals can become depressed if they feel they haven’t been as selfless in life as they imagine they should be, or if those they have helped seem to fall down regardless.

65% of those with the Feeling trait say they mostly listen to their hearts when they make important choices, compared to 7% of those with the Thinking trait.

Feeling personality types’ concern for others typically affects all their endeavors. This can be practical and close, as with family, friends, and colleagues. Or it can be broader, as with world peace, ending hunger, and giving the disadvantaged a boost.

But this reliance on feelings doesn’t mean there is no logic – theirs is just a different logic. They see that emotions can’t simply be waved away, so feelings and the welfare of others shape their lives more than stark facts and cold objectivity. Weighing things this way makes these personalities valuable to have around when the big question is, “Who does this help?”

Comments

Please to join the discussion.

A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
My problem is that I'm always 50/50 thinking and feeling. In situations I will probably be slightly emotional but still have an analytical point of view. I'm able to confort others (most say I'm good at this) but at the same time help offer solutions to their problems which is normally reasuring? So I think I'm on the fence.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Me too! But I got 67% feeling as an INFJ
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
You can't be 50/50 thinking and feeling...
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Not on the fence and I don't see that as a problem at all! You are well balanced (not to say anyone heavier on the feeling or thinking is not balanced) and can function well in both regards. I think this is a good thing! Look at the percentage of each that you are, that should explain it all (not just the letter F or T).
INFJ avatar
That's lucky, I think.
INTP avatar
I'm a Feeler type (to the point some class me as Highly Sensitive), but I'd rather prefer to be a Thinker - My emotions and ramblings get out of hand very fast that all sense of order and rationality are out of the window and no one around me gets it, or they think me too shallow and am immediately shot down (along with an "I told you so" on occasion). Feelings? Nah, I'm down for anyone to teach me how to lock away emotions in favour of logic and cool rationality. I need reason to dictate how I should react and feel.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I suppose you should think about why your ramblings happen. I guess that’s what us Thinkers do, finding reason behind emotion.
INFP avatar
I don't believe a lack of logic is your issue. You simply have a different coping mechanism for stressors. This site has very helpful resources (free) for looking at coping mechanisms (which you use and how to improve), but I there is nothing inherently wrong with thinking or feeling, they are just different approaches to decision making, and combined with either introversion or extraversion, express themselves differently in stressful situations or big decisions. Check out resources on coping mechanisms and how to improve your own and you'll be on the right track. You can't change your personality, but you can use your currents strengths to build and improve your outlook on life, or "get around" inherent weaknesses. Best of luck!
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I suggest embracing your feeling trait. Try doing a hobby that you’re really good at, or just something you love to do. It can help you get your feelings out and think more clearly. I do this (usually by drawing/art), and it helps me relax. Wishing you happiness!
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
This is the only think I can't quite wrap my head around. I don't "override" my feelings, I just add them to the equation. This article seems to imply that Thinking types ignore their feelings in favor of their reasoning, as if you couldn't have one and the other. When you feel, you feel for a reason. It's not smart to ignore that. I think that you can be emotionally intelligent, know your feelings, and take them into account in your reasoning about what to do next. Am I getting something wrong here? Maybe read too much into what the article said?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
As a T, I think what the article said was true. I hide my emotions and make decisions with logic. I also happen to think F types are weak and naive.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
As an INTJ I have to agree with the article too, I keep emotions out of decisions too and "overwrite" them, only a few emotions are sometimes able to change my way of thinking.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I agree! Too much emotion blocks out reasoning, and two much reasoning blocks out emotion. I like to try and use a balance of both reasoning and feelings when it comes to making decisions.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I actually agree with you and not the article. I think that since emotions are a part of human nature, it is only logical to realize them, but not necessarily act on them. I do agree with the article, however, on the claim that Thinking types suppress their emotions, because I certainly do that a lot, but it doesn’t always end with good results. Maybe I think this way though because I’m only ever-so-slightly Thinking. (53%)
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Umm... no? Feeling types are in a way, braver. They don’t hide their emotions and are more cooperative.
ENFJ avatar
I wouldn't call us weak and naive. We have a different way of reasoning and decision making. That doesn't mean that one side is necessarily better. In fact, Feelers can actually be very strong-willed towards a set goal or beliefs.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
That is more if it is bound up with Turbulent
ENFP avatar
Yeah I thought the exact same thing, I don't see how thinking rationally/logically and being open and accepting of your emotions are mutually exclusive. To be honest, suppressing/ignoring emotions seems pretty illogical.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
But you know the F's aren't weak anymore than the T's are cold.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I kinda think they did not word this well. I don't ignore my feelings when I make a decision, but I do keep them in check so I can use logic to make that decision. In the end I know that my feelings will need to be considered or I won't like the outcome.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I'm also 53% T. But I am quite good at making a decision, when others that are more emotional would be so driven by their emotions they could not settle them down long enough to think the situation through. I consider my emotions to a situation when I make a decision, but my emotions do not entirely drive the decision. I think that is the difference between T and F.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
That is not at all fair. You are making it sound like one type is better than the other and I don't think that is true. I am 53% T and am considered pretty brave by friends and family. I don't "push my emotions down" I consider them and make a logical decision that will satisfy both the emotion and logic. I can express my emotions when needed. I just don't wear them on my sleeve, especially sadness. I prefer to cry alone.
INFJ avatar
Louder!
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Well, I have 96% thinking and 4% feeling, I guess that's why I am a wallflower because whenever I talk to people I feel like a robot.
INFJ avatar
I have the opposite - 96% feeling and 4% thinking
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
You 2 should get together! Maybe you'd balance each other out.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I think Introvert or Extrovert would have more of an effect on how you do or feel in a group of people.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
What are your letters?
INFJ avatar
Wow!
INTP avatar
true... again