Nature: Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)

How to Think and Feel About the Thinking and Feeling Traits

Our third, Nature scale reveals the extent to which we value emotions or rationality more when considering options. Does a person tend to use the Thinking (T) personality trait, which relies on the head, or the Feeling (F) trait, which relies on the heart?

But let’s not oversimplify. Think of it instead as you might your hand preference: A left-handed person leans more heavily on their left hand, but they still use their right hand, albeit less. We can apply the same approach to a person with a dominant Thinking trait or a dominant Feeling trait – they aren’t without some qualities of the non-dominant trait.

What about you?

What about you?

Free

Only 10 minutes to get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do.

Take the Test

Thinking (T) Personality

“How Does This Help?”

83% of people with the Thinking trait say it’s best to take a scientific approach to the problems in their own lives, compared to 43% of those with the Feeling trait.

When presented with a decision, people with the Thinking trait typically lean on objective information. Knowledge is their indispensable tool. Once these personality types gather the facts, they test their alternatives against logic and reason to see which decision, by those standards, proves the most effective or realistic. They generally manage their relationships by employing fairness and effectiveness as their primary method of dealing with others. Their passions are born of respect.

74% of people with the Thinking trait say it’s easy for them to make important decisions without consulting with someone else first, compared to 42% of those with the Feeling trait.

Whatever value people with the Thinking personality trait place on relationships, they can still dismiss emotional responses, either their own or those of others. This is often because of their discomfort with emotions, which don’t always follow the rational path they value. Sometimes, emotions just puzzle them. But that doesn’t mean they have hearts of stone. They often feel in deep, profound ways – they would just rather not decide matters from that place. And, perhaps unfortunately, they may see those who do as weaker decision-makers.

People with the Thinking personality trait can use rational thought to see that humans are inherently emotional – and that this is okay.

Personality types with the Thinking trait are likely to evaluate things almost relentlessly. This isn’t as bad as it sounds. They aren’t satisfied if they believe something is not well thought out – they revel in the brilliance of an elegant plan. This makes them great to have around when critical thinking and impartiality of any kind is the focus, and this makes them immensely helpful for sorting out ideas and methods. Their primary filter is, “How does this help?”

Feeling (F) Personality

“Who Does This Help?”

88% of those with the Feeling trait said they value and cherish their emotions, compared to 47% of those with the Thinking trait.

People with the Feeling (F) trait follow their hearts and emotions – sometimes without even realizing it. They may show it to different degrees and in different ways, but however they do it, Feeling personality types tend to be caring, compassionate, and warm. These concerned people can be highly protective of those they care about – whether that is their immediate family or remote populations in need.

For those with the Feeling trait, decisions tend to be based on the well-being of others.

However, people with the Feeling personality trait often find they become excessive in their concern for others. They may easily burn out – or cause others to – when they become too involved. These emotionally aware individuals can become depressed if they feel they haven’t been as selfless in life as they imagine they should be, or if those they have helped seem to fall down regardless.

65% of those with the Feeling trait say they mostly listen to their hearts when they make important choices, compared to 7% of those with the Thinking trait.

Feeling personality types’ concern for others typically affects all their endeavors. This can be practical and close, as with family, friends, and colleagues. Or it can be broader, as with world peace, ending hunger, and giving the disadvantaged a boost.

But this reliance on feelings doesn’t mean there is no logic – theirs is just a different logic. They see that emotions can’t simply be waved away, so feelings and the welfare of others shape their lives more than stark facts and cold objectivity. Weighing things this way makes these personalities valuable to have around when the big question is, “Who does this help?”

Comments

Please to join the discussion.

INFP avatar
For me, the fact that I'm always aware of my feelings can be really exhausting because sometimes it's hard for me to focus on the present cause I'm so concentrated of analysing myself and what I'm feeling right now (especially in difficult situations)
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I really don't understand the difference 100% clearly, so if someone is willing to give me some extra explanation in the comments it would be nice. Y got 54% feeling so I'd say I use both of them often and that's why I can't really see the difference.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Hm? It says "T" in your type though so it should be 54% thinking though, no? The difference is e.g. explained in the difference between "manager" and "leader" of a company/section of it. Please note it's just taking the same position and giving it two terms in leading style! A "Manager" (thinker) may look at the numbers and say: "We're not efficient enough, we need to increase our production pace." They'll increase the profit seemingly that way, but may cause health problems with stressed employees and hence cause costs for society as a whole. A "Leader" (feeler) may notice: "We're not efficient enough!" and think of how to motivate employees, how to improve their skills or might hire additional people. They may increase efficiency but also increase the costs for the company. Yet, their care for their employees may result in added value for society. The contrary example: The thinker leader may look at the numbers and take measures to safe the company and secure the outcome for the employees, even if it puts some strain on them for a while. They can assure the company can afford to do what they do. And they're eventually very ready to throw everyone off board who stalls necessary growth out of mere fear of change or inflexibility. A feeler leader might be so focused on the employees, that they'll sacrifice quality standards which then leads to the company shutting down OR the company survives but there's little money in the system, so everyone feels comfortable but still struggles with financial worries. Or they worry where to get the budget to replace that important machine needed for production. They may also struggle to fire a person who really is not cut out for their job (anymore) based on feeling very compassionate of the private, financial and psychological consequences for the employee in question. Both can be social and unsocial, productive or unproductive but they'll be so in different areas and for different reasons. Does this help?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Pardon me, it should be "the thinker manager" in the second set of examples, to stick to the same terminology.
INTP avatar
I believe this is too simplistic to cover the whole spectrum. As a founder and CEO who definitely relates to the thinker trait more (although I’m here to understand the differentiation better, but the test result states Thinker 4x) I can assure you there’s a lot more logic to choosing employee happiness over deadlines and quality nowadays. Certainly in this day and age, in the tech/software industry for one, and at least here in the Netherlands. Although I also just care for the people that work with/for me, I also realize that 1. It’s not that simple finding knowledgeable, intelligent workforce, and it sure isn’t easy to find loyal people. And then there’s also the budget-factor.
INFP avatar
I got 92% feeling LOL
INFP avatar
(Continued) I make decisions based on how I feel because I'm afraid if I don't I will regret something and end up with the daunting feelings of remorse and longing for something different. If that makes any sense
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
same
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
lol
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I feel (lol) like my thinking is too complex and overwhelming as to actively think my way to a conclusion. It's not fast enough. So I feel the result of my felt AND thought processes. It's like: Letting the subconscious rambling (thoughts as emotions) go by to preserve time and energy. And to then feel into the conclusion as a shortcut to reap the final result. I'll do the active thinking when I'm alone and dwelling and going through simulations and wold building. Hence: rather in a free, timeless space. And mostly, situations requiring decisions providing none of that. Especially not when outside the home.
INTP avatar
"I'm afraid if I don't I will regret something" The issue here is that feelings change. Acting purely based on emotions will lead to serious regret once those particular feelings fade.
INTP avatar
The interestIng thing about making decisions with your head vs heart is that sometimes when I follow my gut I'm not following my heart in the emotional sense. I'm really following my intuition after I've spent long, agonizing hours of weighing the pros and cons of every minute detail of what could possibly occur after the decision is made. I hold so many details in my head that I can't remember them consciously at the same time. I have to "feel" my thoughts.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Something I didn't understand is that being a thinker doesn't mean that you don't have fellings, it means the tool you use to reach the objective that your feeling are telling you to reach is the logic and the efficiency, and being a feeler means that the tool you use for the same objective is the cooperation and harmony. I thought ignorantly that thinkers were robots and feelers were dramatic artistic people (a thinker can be more passionate than a feeler), I have to say that I didn't understand the "head vs heart" metaphor because I try to understand things the most specific way possible, so I'm glad I could get it now.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Something I understood*
INTP avatar
Wisteria, that seems to align well with the Feeling trait. Of course, everyone relies on their intuition most of the time, but you seem to be describing important decisions after all.
INFJ avatar
I’m not sure how much my upbringing has effected this, but while I totally am feelings, My worldview and beliefs can be EXTREMELY cold hard logical. Normally in the name of something better or good mind you, but still im completely aware that while I’m super nice and wish only good things for humanity as a whole, if you started to press me on some of my views you’d find cold, logic and cynicism. But maybe the fact that I’m feeling helps me see that’s what those views are. I wonder if most thinking types notice when their views or decisions are cold logic bereft of emotion?
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Same. :)
INFP avatar
Yes, I was just thinking about this myself, and I'm the same way.