Types of Loyalty and Types of People

Darrell's avatar

Sometimes people will ask: Which personality type is the most loyal? The difficulty with that question is that loyalty comes in a lot of different flavors and can mean a lot of different things.

If you Google “loyalty”, you’ll find the first pages dominated by the subject of customer loyalty. This is loyalty reduced to a marketing scheme. But there’s much more to it than that. While probably too complex of a subject for a short article, let’s try to sort it out as much as we can anyway.

What about you?

What about you?

Free

Only 10 minutes to get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do.

Take the Test

The Loyal Sentinels

In our model, Sentinel personality types are the most traditionally loyal among all the groups. They are fiercely loyal to their families, communities and employers. On top of that, they are faithful to the traditions and values that those who went before them passed along. We know them for their hard-work which relates to their sense of duty which is synonymous with loyalty.

The Feeling, especially Turbulent, Sentinels’ loyalty is likely a combination of a sense of duty with a heavy dose of emotionality mixed in. They’ll see their loyalty as being faithful to others and supporting them. Thinking Sentinels’ loyalty is more likely to come from a sense of duty and a need to see things through to a successful end. These personality types, especially Assertive ones, are less likely to involve emotions when they consider their loyalties. They are loyal to the “tried and true”.

Diplomats: The Romantic Loyalists

Diplomats will see loyalty in a more romanticized way. This is less about the standards revered by the Sentinels and more about passion and subjective belief. Loyalty to a life partner might involve being “soul mates” – there may be concern for traditional values or external standards or rules or not. (“Star-crossed lovers” in art and history who went against family and culture may serve as symbols here: King Edward VIII and Mrs. Wallis or Romeo and Juliet, for example.) If Diplomat personality types become ignited with a passion for a cause, they will be loyal to that cause and work hard for it. The same with a job if they feel it is purposeful and significant.

This loyalty can be a bit shakier than the type enjoyed by the Sentinels. Should these visionaries become disillusioned, all bets are off and loyalty may quickly become a thing of the past. Since they bind their loyalty more to emotions, they may even stand strongly against that to which they were once loyal if disappointed by it. This loyalty leans more toward subjectivity than the Sentinels’ variety.

Analysts: The Conceptual Loyalists

This analytical group will be loyal to known systems or schools of thought. For example, architects who are also this style of visionary may hold firmly to the theories of a particular school of architecture. They will be “loyal” to those theories. (Not blindly. They tend to be open-minded. But once they’ve reached a solid conclusion, they stick until there is enough evidence to the contrary.) They don’t accept others academically or professionally until they have proven themselves. But when these others show they are adept enough, Analyst personalities will embrace them heartily and loyally.

So, how does this translate into an Analyst’s personal life? It would be inaccurate to say Analysts are without emotions – they can feel deeply. However, they use rationality much more than any of the Feeling types. This use includes how they assess the people in their private lives.

When looking for a life partner, Analyst personality types may have a checklist, either consciously or subconsciously, of the person they are looking for. When they find their match, they are likely to be loyal to the other person. If this is the most logical partner, according to the features set in advance and sought, then loyalty is a reasonable response. That doesn’t mean there aren’t feelings involved. But rationality remains the core of any of their alliances. Being loyal is something that “makes sense” to this style of visionary.

Explorers: The Reluctant Loyalists?

This is the most difficult of the personality types when it comes to discussing loyalty. This role group is notorious for their novelty-seeking focus. If they are always looking for something “new”, that person, place or thing that is “old” will naturally have heavy competition. This dynamic does not bode well when it comes to a discussion of loyalty.

While they may not want to stick around on many levels, that doesn’t mean there aren’t rational or emotional things pulling them to stay. (This, in fact, is true of any of the personality types discussed above.) Many Explorers have had long, happy relationships or have remained with causes or institutions for long periods of time. The desire to move on doesn’t necessarily govern the many other factors that can convince one to behave loyally.

Many consider Paul McCartney, musician and animal rights activist, to be among this group. His exploration of different styles of music over his long career supports that assessment. However, in the 29 years he was married to his wife, Linda, he reportedly did not spend as much as seven days apart from her. They would probably still be together today had she not passed away. That’s dedication. Other things do come into play.

Now that we’ve generalized here, what is your experience? Is it consistent with this article or do you have something more to add? Join the conversation in the comment section below.

Support staff Sentinel icon with a speech bubble.
Full understanding is just a click away…

Take our free Personality Test and get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do. If you’ve already taken the test, you can to revisit your results any time you’d like!

Comments

Please to join the discussion.

A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Loyalty for me, is earned through time and shared beliefs/interests. I have a small group of friends that I have stuck by for years, and a larger group that is constantly refreshed and regrouped. I would do anything for my close friends, including rejecting my newer ones. As an extrovert, the people I’m closer to tend to be better company, or to keep me less bored.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Me too but we are part of the same group
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Let’s say there’s an argument going on. A lot of what I do is ask questions. I like to ask questions even once I think I understand their side of the argument. It gives them a chance to see the parts of their side that might be illogical without them feeling like I’m attacking them. If someone I’m loyal to is in the wrong, I might handle the situation a bit differently. I’m more likely to explain or defend the side I agree with instead of (or before) trying to get them to see the flaws in their side. After I’ve laid out what think, I’ll let them decide what happens. (Is laid the right word?) Basically, I guess I’m more on the offensive with strangers(leading them towards the flaws in their logic, caring less about how they might feel, explaining my side only once they’ve noticed their faulty logic or when they ask). With friends, I’m more on the defensive in a way (explaining my side, leaving them to think about it, compare the two, and see which one ((mine:) )) is the more logically sound one, give them the chance and the time to look past their emotion without me dragging them the whole way). I give my friends, or the people I’m loyal to, the benefit of the doubt. I don’t know if people know how big a thing that is (For INTPs, or for me? I don’t know. Let me know if you relate or if I explained this really badly). This was long and honestly probably not very useful, but if you read this far...you are a patient person. Or a bored person. Have a good day! :)
INFP avatar
Yes, I'm a bored person.
INTP avatar
For me I read until the end because I'm a curious person lol
INFJ avatar
Yes curious!
INFP avatar
This was really insightful and interesting. X
ISFJ avatar
Hei I'm an ISFJ-T Wkwk this is describe me why I am can be loyal wherever I am. No matter it's my first experience or just try a new thing. In the end, I will give my loyalty to that environment
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
Similar to other INTPs (subset T). Have an open mind about things until I make a loyal decision, & then my mind is shut on that item forever. For example, I was an agnostic, b/c I didn’t have any religious understanding. It seems my parents (mainline Presbyterians) just assumed I already believed, or would believe, as they did. They gave me no reason to go along w/ them. Then I married a Byzantine Catholic, & eventually became a believer by using Occam’s Razor, w/ support from Pascal’s Wager. (Turned out b/f being converted to Presb., my great-grandparents were also Byz. Cath., so I was actually fixing things anyway.) Later he wanted us to change to Roman Cath., but it’s so different, I was spiritually alienated. My soul was already Byz. Fortunately for us, the priest said it’s impossible to change. A Rite’s an inheritance: if you’re not already Cath. or Orthodox, you can convert to any 1 of 24 national groups (Particular Churches), or you can marry from 1 into another, but besides those exceptions, you’re forever whatever your father is, e.g. Roman, Greek, Coptic… Switching I think would be throwing away your inheritance, but still being allowed a different inheritance (doesn’t make sense). So thank God things worked out like they did. Politics likewise. Was irritated by others’ assumptions. Analyzed all I encountered. Tried or considered, but had to reject: the full spectrum from L to R, all the parties, voting, democratic ‘representation’, the ‘social contract’, all the justification of the govt of the country… But when I came to political ideas that made sense & had a basis that didn’t fall apart, I accepted them permanently. Even b/f becoming a Christian, I implicitly accepted the Catholic understanding of marriage being indissoluble. I could never have accepted the possibility of divorce, or even worse, remarriage. Prob. largely b/c my parents did, & so I’m certain divorce & remarriage are selfish & mess up innocent kids’ lives & scar them forever. Pain, upheaval, betraying my own conscience, & public shame make changing loyalties devastating, so I usu. hold off decisions. I think my husband thinks if it had been up to me, I never would convert, so I’d be a catechumen forever studying the Bible & trying to decide if it’s true, but actually, one day things just came together airtight in my head, & that was enough. So I analyze things until that happens, or until I'm forced to choose.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I would say Analysts are the most loyal to their own goals. Why? Because if something makes sense to Analysts, they will use whole power of their mind to achieve or support that. And as it is commonly known and even included in Analysts' description - they are extremerly strong-willed, even those with strong Percieving trait. And that's because they can visualise how to achieve what they want thanks to their imagination. Since this strongly rational group shares thinking trait, they do not abandon things just because of failure or negative emotions if they truly believe in something.
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I concur. I was a bit surprised to see they put loyalty to concepts/theories. My immediate thought was: since when? For me, concepts/theories are just a means to an end: my goals, whatever they happen to be. Like you said, I am only truly loyal to my goals.
ENTP avatar
I think the reason they put towards concepts and ideas more so than our goals is that on some level one could state that they go hand in hand, and in fact concepts underly our goals. While it may seem as if you are loyal to your "goals", those goals are informed based on how you see the world. On the other hand, given rational based thinking, I for one would not be willing to actually stop believing in something's truthfulness because I want something else to happen. Even if I treat it as if I'm departing from the idea or I tell others I don't believe in it, I would still consider it to be true and use that knowledge accordingly. As such, imo, concepts are a more foundational level to our goals and that's what we're really "loyal" to, although that's not how I would term it. Feel free to correct me if I've made a mistake in my reasoning