Personality Types vs. Stereotypes

Kyle's avatar

The 16 personality types are unique, with each group defined by their traits and the behavioral tendencies that go along with them. Based on statistics, personality typing allows for accurate descriptions and assessments of people. But there’s a difference between personality typing, which can be very helpful in many areas of life, and stereotyping, which can be harmful. Understanding that difference is important for the sake of fairness, accuracy, and usefulness. Let’s consider how personality types differ from stereotypes.

What about you?

What about you?

Free

Only 10 minutes to get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do.

Take the Test

Likelihoods vs. Certainties

A stereotype assumes that someone conforms to a broad rule. For example, take the beliefs that Introverts don’t like to go out, prefer to be alone, are shy about meeting new people, etc. Those beliefs can influence real-world outcomes, like if an Introvert is excluded socially based on such assumptions. “Sam’s an Introvert and Introverts don’t go out, so we don’t invite Sam to go out.”

Personality typing, on the other hand, says that while Introverts may indeed be less socially inclined than Extraverts overall, it’s relative. Most Introverts like to go out with friends, meet new people, and attend gatherings, to some degree. They might be less likely than an Extravert to accept every social invitation, yet they still do so some of the time – and they appreciate the opportunity either way.

In real life, the truth of Introversion is often nuanced and requires more understanding than simplistic stereotypes allow for. The same is true for all personality traits and types – their associated tendencies can be likely but not completely consistent from person to person or instance to instance. Stereotypes are clumsy and too extreme to be useful.

Identity vs. Perception

Another way that stereotypes and personality types differ is in their origin. A stereotype is a label applied to someone from an outside source, and it may reflect the biases of those who apply it more than the qualities of those to whom it’s applied. Stereotypes are limiting because they only include what’s perceived by the observer, not what’s going on under the surface. Even if bias is minimal, any such assessment is likely to be incomplete at best.

Personality typing, on the other hand, relies on self-recognition and objective evaluation of internal thoughts, feelings, values, and beliefs, as well as measuring behaviors that may be more externally visible. Someone’s personality type is as much a disclosure as an assessment because of their awareness and participation in defining themselves. Personality typing includes critical elements of self-awareness and identity, not merely external perception.

So, in real life, treating people according to stereotypes is like subjecting them to limited external judgments. It’s essentially a one-sided declaration: “Here’s what we think you are because of how we perceive you.” But when you approach someone through the lens of personality type, it’s more like a mutual dialogue that includes self-identified, internal, authentic parts of themselves. It’s more like a conversation than a declaration.

Connecting vs. Dividing

Stereotypes and personality types are often used in very different ways. As simplistic absolutes that tend to reflect people’s biases, stereotypes often function negatively. They can demean or dismiss others by failing to accurately reflect – and respect – who they truly are. Stereotypes tend to encourage barriers between people, often leading to “othering.”

But since it’s far more nuanced, truthful, and inclusive of people’s own awareness and identity, personality typing enables people to understand each other. It expands and humanizes their perceptions and positively affects their interactions. This can encourage communication, respect, and empathy, making personality typing a good way to bring people together.

In very real terms, the difference between stereotypes and personality types can be a matter of belief versus fact. Stereotypes frequently reinforce false perceptions and ignorance, while personality types tend to reveal authentic truths. The former can prevent compatibility, whereas the latter often highlights it. Stereotyping may be an outgrowth of some understandable, basic human instincts, but they’re not our better instincts.

Where to Go from Here

Support staff Sentinel icon with a speech bubble.
Full understanding is just a click away…

Take our free Personality Test and get a “freakishly accurate” description of who you are and why you do things the way you do. If you’ve already taken the test, you can to revisit your results any time you’d like!

Comments

Please to join the discussion.

INTJ avatar
I would say that as an INTJ I do possess some stereotypical traits of an INTJ however I would say, stereotypes of personalities are not entirely correct
INTJ avatar
I wish the INTJ stereotypes were correct . World dominator, 10-year plan to take over the world..
INTJ avatar
Believe it or not I have a ten year plan to move japan
INTJ avatar
That's good, but there's a lot of skeptisism about the future of Japan's economy. Even though there are statistics that show potential improvement, the opposite is true. A backup plan would help.
INTJ avatar
Oh, I have a back up plan. I’ve studied their economy the tax situation, the culture, the cultural differences, the culture shock every possible scenario I have studied.
ENFJ avatar
Your guyses personality types are coming out in your convo. I'm loving it, from the world of the Diplomat (INFJ-T), peace out.
ENFJ avatar
I found this article greatly clarifying about how to understand stereotyping and personifying's differences, which can and will help with baggage from past stereotyping experiences. It's amazing how much people judge of appearances in every situation, but especially on the first look.
INTJ avatar
And why Japan? Go to another country's for growing more :D
INTJ avatar
Well, Japan might not be growing. It’s still an incredible culture and actually has incredible perseverance also, I only plan to stay there for like 10 to 15 years
A grayscale avatar for an anonymous user
I felt this great article put this concept of personality typing and stereotypes into really good words.
INTP avatar
yall this was nice!
INFJ avatar
This is so true! Stereotypes are not at all as accurate as personality types are. My best friend is quiet on the outside, but once you get to know her, she is very outgoing!
ENFJ avatar
That's how my closest friends describe me, lol. Really resonated with the part where he was talking about how introverted motives are complicated, and they also like making new friends. Once it was explained to me like, "introverts prefer less and more meaningful interactions with less people".
ENTP avatar
I don’t normally find it worthwhile to comment on topics like this that will arguably never reach resolute ends beyond speculation, yet I will say that while it is true the human psyche is more complex than logistical outputs from given data, I would not completely dismiss stereotypes as ‘falsehoods’ that juxtapose that of ‘authenticity’— because to some extent you need foundational empirical evidence that (most of the time are the most simple basis of stereotypes) to fit within the definition. I understand your main points, but disagree with some the specific phrasing’s you used, since stereotypes are indeed a facet of one’s personality, but as you stated, not the entire personality itself. it should be considered that while systems will always be nuanced, there must remain some consistency of traits in which they adhere to or else the system would contradict itself. Thus, stereotypes arise, but i believe it is only when these stereotypes are turned into qualifying factors In which they validate upon entry where it can become a problem
INFJ avatar
Good point
INFJ avatar
很多时间懒得理是因为觉得显而易见没必要浪费时间,并不是我“丧失了辩论的欲望”